8 XXX : MilitaryGoneWild

That escalated quickly.
Someone made a comment asking about the legality of threesomes... I did all the legwork and they deleted the comment. So in case anyone is wondering: IANAJ (I am not a JAG), but I believe you are right. UCMJ is pretty black and white on this, by my interpretation. Adultery is adultery, even if all three parties consent to it. > Article 134, paragraph 62 >(1) That the accused wrongfully had sexual intercourse with a certain person; >(2) That, at the time, the accused or the other person was married to someone else; and >(3) That, under the circumstances, the conduct of the accused was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
If anyone makes a"privates standing at attention" joke I will personally shove their own leg down their throat.
Something something Jody something... I got nothing.
Dam there must be video some where
Where was she when I was in?